Page 2 of 3

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Sat 16 Apr 2011 18:32
by Maxim Khlopov
Dear Larisa,
In addition to my corrections - you should say that the main problem of calculation of abundances of anomalous isotopes in the composite dark matter model is in the nuclear physics of OHe, which is only in the process of its development.
If you can make rough estimations, it would be great
Regards
M.Yu.Khlopov

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Mon 18 Apr 2011 20:42
by Larisa_MEPhI
Maxim Yur'evich!
I tried to take into account all your corrections for exeption the last one (here). Continue working

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Tue 19 Apr 2011 00:48
by Maxim Khlopov
Dear Larisa,
Please find in attachement text with my corrections;
Regards
M.Yu.Khlopov

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Sun 24 Apr 2011 13:46
by Larisa_MEPhI
Good day, Maxim Yur'evich!
I have tried to consider all your comments.

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Sun 24 Apr 2011 14:50
by Maxim Khlopov
Dear Larisa,
It is close to the end but not final:
Please find my comments in the attached file
editorial corrections - please choose a unique notation for OHe, O^-- and S_3 (or S_2)
essential - please use correct explanation for DAMA result in O-helium model (see lecture on Dark Atoms or latest papers)
Regards
M.Yu.Khlopov

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Sun 24 Apr 2011 15:02
by Maxim Khlopov
Dera Larisa,
To facilitate your search for correct explanation of DAMA signal, please use the results of
http://arxiv.org/PS_cache/arxiv/pdf/1011/1011.4586v1.pdf
Regards
M.Yu.Khlopov

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Sun 24 Apr 2011 20:27
by Larisa_MEPhI
I was trying to do my best. I believe I correct all Your marks

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Sun 24 Apr 2011 22:12
by Maxim Khlopov
Dear Larisa,
I can uderstand your wish to conclude, but still there remain:
stylistic correction - you can cut all the details about explanation of DAMA signal - it is not essential for your aims
essential - you should be careful: numbers in Ch.2 were obtained for S_3=m/1TeV, while in Ch.4 for S_2=m/100 GeV.
If you change S_3 by S _2 in Ch. 2 you should re-calculate numerical factors in rexpressions.
I look forward to a really final version
Regards
M.Yu.Khlopov

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Mon 25 Apr 2011 09:00
by Larisa_MEPhI
Maxim Yur'evich!
I thought about your corrections right after I've downloaded to You my last version.
I believe, this is it.

Re: реферат Коротковой Ларисы

New postPosted: Mon 25 Apr 2011 12:36
by Maxim Khlopov
Dear Larisa,
Your referat is accepted with my small editorial corrections, made
in the attached file.
You are admitted to exam.
Regards
M.Yu.Khlopov