Small Thesis and exam of Aisen Nikiforov

[Eisen Nikiforov]

Dear, Maxim Yuryevich!
Sorry to post my work so late. I put the first version of thesis. I will try to send add-ons in the coming days. Waiting for your comments and corrections.

[Maxim Khlopov]

Dear Aisen,
I look forward to completion of your work.
My comments are in the attached file
With the best regards
M.Yu.Khlopov

[Eisen Nikiforov]

Dear Maxim Yurevich,

Here is my second version. I have narrowed the subject a bit. At least I think so. Since this is not the final text, so I do not do the content yet.

[Eisen Nikiforov]

I added a few words about PBH

[Maxim Khlopov]

Dear Aisen,
You did, but didn't address some previous comments of mine.
My comments are in the attached file.
You have rather specific original style. I like it, but I am not sure that it sounds well in English
With the best regards
M.Yu. Khlopov

[Eisen Nikiforov]

Good evening!
I have a question about a single comment. "Since all luminous matter [dominant fraction of baryons is nonluminous!] essentially consists of baryons". Yes, I agree that dominant fraction of baryons is nonluminous, but does not luminous matter basically consist of baryons?

[Maxim Khlopov]

Dear Aisen,
I got your argument. It is again your original style, which I like, but it can lead to misunderstanding.
Still: there is luminous matter - a small fraction of the whole baryonic matter. Therefore, there is nonluminous baryonic matter and 5 times larger fraction of nonluminous matter, which is nonbaryonic.
Have I clarified this point?
With the best regards
M.Yu.Khlopov

[Eisen Nikiforov]

Thanks for the quick response.

[Eisen Nikiforov]

Dear, Maxim Yuryevich.
I corrected not everything, but corrected something. I will send further corrections in the coming days.

[Maxim Khlopov]

Dear Aisen,
Yes, indeed, a lot of my comments are still not addressed.
The text with some new comments together with the old that are still not corrected is attached.
To make some calculations in your work, please, take the mechanism of gravitino freeze in (e.g. as calculated in my book) and derive themomentum distribution function in the primordial gravitino gas.
The main point: you should say that all the DM candidates appear as consequences of physics beyond the Standard model that is needed to solve the SM problems and illustrate it by the examples, which you consider.
I look forward to the version, which takes into account all my comments.
With the best regards
M.Yu.Khlopov